Examining the relationship between head trauma and opioid use disorder: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To examine recent literature and determine common clinical risk factors between antecedent traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the following development of opioid misuse and provide a framework for clinical identification of at-risk subjects and evaluate potential treatment implications within this association. DESIGN: A comprehensive systematic literature search of PubMed was conducted for articles between 2000 and December 2022. Studies were included if the human participant had any head trauma exposure and any chronic opioid use or dependence. After eligibility criteria were applied, 16 studies were assessed for thematic trends. RESULTS: Opioid use disorder (OUD) risks are heightened in cohorts with head trauma exposed to opioids while in the hospital, specifically with tramadol and oxycodone. Chronic pain was the most common predictor of long-term OUD, and continuous somatic symptoms associated with the TBI can lead to long-term opioid usage. Individuals who present with coexisting psychiatric conditions pose significantly more risk associated with a higher risk of long-term opioid use. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that therapists and clinicians must consider a risk profile for persons with TBI and follow an integrated care approach to account for mental health, prior substance misuse, presenting somatic symptoms, and current medication regimen during evaluation.

Riesgo de hemorragia cerebral en el traumatismo craneal leve y tratamiento antitrombótico / Risk of cerebral hemorrhage in mild traumatic brain injury and antithrombotic treatment

Objetivo El tiempo de observación en el traumatismo craneoencefálico leve (TCEL) es controvertido. Nuestro objetivo se basó en evaluar el riesgo de complicaciones neurológicas en el TCEL con y sin tratamiento antitrombótico. Método Evaluamos retrospectivamente los pacientes con TCEL atendidos en urgencias durante 3 años. Consideramos TCEL aquellos con Glasgow ≥13 al ingreso. Se realizó una TC craneal en todos los casos con >1 factor de riesgo al ingreso y a las 24h en aquellos con deterioro neurológico o TC craneal inicial patológica. Se revisó retrospectivamente las complicaciones en los siguientes 3 meses. Resultados Evaluamos 907 pacientes con una edad media de 73±19 años. El 91% presentaron factores de riesgo, con un 60% en tratamiento antitrombótico. Detectamos un 11% de hemorragia cerebral inicial, 0,4% a las 24h y ningún caso a los 3 meses. El tratamiento antitrombótico no se asoció con incremento de riesgo de hemorragia cerebral (9,9 con vs. 11,9% sin tratamiento; p=0,3). El 39% de las hemorragias presentaron síntomas neurológicos (18% amnesia postraumática, 12% cefalea, 8% vómitos, 1% convulsiones), siendo en un 78,4% síntomas leves. De las 4 hemorragias detectadas a las 24h, 3 fueron asintomáticas y un caso emporó la cefalea inicial. Ningún paciente asintomático sin lesión en la TC craneal inicial presentó clínica a las 24h. Conclusiones Nuestro estudio sugiere que los pacientes con TCEL asintomáticos, sin lesión en la TC craneal inicial no precisarían periodo de observación ni TC craneal de control, independientemente del tratamiento antitrombótico o nivel de INR (AU)

Introduction The observation time in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is controversial. Our aim was to assess the risk of neurological complications in mTBI with and without antithrombotic treatment. Method We retrospectively evaluated patients with mTBI seen in the emergency room for 3 years. We considered MTBI those with Glasgow ≥13 at admission. A cranial CT was performed in all cases with >1 risk factor at admission and at 24h in those with neurological impairment or initial pathological cranial CT. Complications in the following 3 months were retrospectively reviewed. Results We evaluated 907 patients with a mean age of 73±19 years. Ninety-one percent presented risk factors, with 60% on antithrombotic treatment. We detected 11% of initial brain hemorrhage, 0.4% at 24h, and no cases at 3 months. Antithrombotic treatment was not associated with an increased risk of brain hemorrhage (9.9% with vs. 11.9% without treatment, P=.3). 39% of the hemorrhages presented neurological symptoms (18% post-traumatic amnesia, 12% headache, 8% vomiting, 1% seizures), with 78.4% having mild symptoms. Of the 4 hemorrhages detected at 24h, 3 were asymptomatic and one case that worsened the initial headache. No asymptomatic patient without lesion on initial clinical cranial CT presented at 24h. Conclusions Our study suggests that patients with asymptomatic mTBI, without a lesion on the initial cranial CT, would not require the observation period or CT control regardless of antithrombotic treatment or INR level (AU)

[Application Effect of Continuous Lumbar Cistern Fluid Drainage Combined With Decompressive Craniectomy in the Treatment of Severe Craniocerebral Injury].

Objective: To analyze the application effect of continuous lumbar cistern fluid drainage combined with decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury. Methods: A total of 87 patients with severe craniocerebral injury admitted to our hospital between March 2016 and March 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. They were divided into two groups according to the decompression methods applied, with 42 patients who received standard decompressive craniectomy assigned to the control group and 45 patients who received continuous lumbar cistern fluid drainage combined with standard decompressive craniectomy assigned to the observation group. The primary indicators that were monitored and compared between the two group included the amount of time for patient CT imaging to be clear of subarachnoid hemorrhage, the length-of-stay, the duration of post-operative intubation, the mannitol dose, scores for Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), prognosis, the incidence of cerebral edema and cerebral infarction, and complications. The secondary indicators that were monitored and compared included intracranial pressure, cerebrospinal fluid antinucleosome protein SP100, and red blood cell count of the two groups before treatment and after continuous drainage for 7 days. Results: The amount of time for CT imaging to be clear of subarachnoid hemorrhage and the length-of-stay of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, the mannitol dose of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, the incidence of cerebral edema and the incidence of complications of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the rate of patients with good prognosis in the observation group was higher than that in the control group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of poor prognosis or mortality between the two groups ( P>0.05). The duration of postoperative intubation of the observation group was (8.24±1.09) d, while that of the control group was (9.22±1.26) d, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( t=3.887, P<0.05). There were 2 cases (4.44%) of cerebral infarction in the observation group, with the infarct volume being (8.36±1.87) cm 3, while there were 9 cases (21.43%) of cerebral infarction in the control group, with the infarct volume being (8.36±1.87) cm 3, and there were statistically significant differences in the incidence and volume of cerebral infarction between the two groups ( χ 2=5.674, t=9.609, P<0.05). After treatment, the intracranial pressure and red blood cell count decreased in both groups and the intracranial pressure, cerebrospinal fluid SP100, and red blood cell count of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group ( P<0.05). The cerebrospinal fluid SP100 of the observation group decreased after treatment in comparison with the level before treatment ( P<0.05), while the pre- and post-treatment levels of the control group did not demonstrate any significant difference. Conclusion: Continuous lumbar cistern fluid drainage in patients with severe craniocerebral injury effectively shortens the time required for the body to recover, significantly reduces the level of intracranial pressure, improves the levels of cerebral edema and cerebral infarction, and has a high degree of safety for prognosis and recovery.

Investigation of Neuroprotective Effect of Shilajit Extract in Experimental Head Trauma Model Created in Rats.

AIM: To investigate the neuroprotective effect of shilajit extract in experimental head trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three groups of 33 Sprague Dawley Albino strain male rats were included in the study. Group 1 (n=11): trauma but not treated. Group 2 (n=11): trauma and treated with 0.5 mL / rat saline Group 3 (n=11): 150 mg / kg shilajit extract was administered intraperitoneally in the treatment of trauma. Following the head trauma, the indicated treatments were applied to the 2nd and 3rd groups at the first, twenty-four and forty-eighth hours. Brain tissues and blood samples were taken after the control animals were sacrificed at the 72nd hour in all groups after trauma. Sections prepared from cerebral cortex and ca1 region were examined with hematoxylin eosin and luxol fast blue staining. Total antioxidant capacity, total oxidant capacity and oxidative stress index were measured from blood samples taken after routine procedures. RESULTS: The number of red neurons and the severity of edema were significantly higher in both the cerebral cortex and the ca1 region in the group treated with trauma only and in the group administered saline after trauma compared to the group that received shilajit extract after trauma. The total antioxidant capacity increased significantly in blood samples taken only from the group treated with trauma and saline in post-trauma treatment compared to the group given post-traumatic shilajit extract, while shilajit extract given due to traumatic brain injury significantly decreased the total oxidant capacity and oxidative stress index values compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION: Shilajit extract has been shown to have a neuroprotective effect in the treatment of acute traumatic brain injury. Our study showed that shilajit may be a useful option in the treatment of secondary brain injury, in humans.

Neuroprotective Effects of Nanowired Delivery of Cerebrolysin with Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Monoclonal Antibodies to Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase in Brain Pathology Following Alzheimer's Disease Exacerbated by Concussive Head Injury.

Concussive head injury (CHI) is one of the major risk factors in developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) in military personnel at later stages of life. Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in CHI leads to extravasation of plasma amyloid beta protein (ΑßP) into the brain fluid compartments precipitating AD brain pathology. Oxidative stress in CHI or AD is likely to enhance production of nitric oxide indicating a role of its synthesizing enzyme neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in brain pathology. Thus, exploration of the novel roles of nanomedicine in AD or CHI reducing NOS upregulation for neuroprotection are emerging. Recent research shows that stem cells and neurotrophic factors play key roles in CHI-induced aggravation of AD brain pathologies. Previous studies in our laboratory demonstrated that CHI exacerbates AD brain pathology in model experiments. Accordingly, it is quite likely that nanodelivery of NOS antibodies together with cerebrolysin and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) will induce superior neuroprotection in AD associated with CHI. In this review, co-administration of TiO2 nanowired cerebrolysin - a balanced composition of several neurotrophic factors and active peptide fragments, together with MSCs and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to neuronal NOS is investigated for superior neuroprotection following exacerbation of brain pathology in AD exacerbated by CHI based on our own investigations. Our observations show that nanowired delivery of cerebrolysin, MSCs and neuronal NOS in combination induces superior neuroprotective in brain pathology in AD exacerbated by CHI, not reported earlier.

Therapeutic review: The role of tranexamic acid in management of traumatic brain injury, nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

PURPOSE: To summarize current literature evaluating tranexamic acid in the management of intracranial bleeding associated with traumatic and nontraumatic brain injuries and implications for clinical practice. SUMMARY: Intracranial hemorrhage, regardless of etiology, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic with anti-inflammatory properties shown to reduce mortality in trauma patients with extracranial injuries. In traumatic brain injury, a large randomized trial found no difference in outcomes when tranexamic acid was compared to placebo; however, subgroup analyses suggested that it may reduce head injury-related mortality in the context of mild-to-moderate injury if treatment occurs within 1 hour of symptom onset. More recent out-of-hospital data have disputed these findings and even suggested harm in severely injured patients. In spontaneous, nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, treatment with tranexamic acid did not result in a difference in functional status; however, rates of hematoma expansion, even though modest, were significantly reduced. In aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, tranexamic acid may prevent rebleeding, but has not led to improved outcomes or reduced mortality, and there is concern for increased incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia. Overall, tranexamic acid has not been shown to result in increased risk of thromboembolic complications across these classes of brain injury. CONCLUSION: Despite its favorable safety profile overall, tranexamic acid does not seem to improve functional outcomes and cannot be routinely recommended. More data are needed to determine which head injury subpopulations are most likely to benefit from tranexamic acid and which patients are at increased risk for harm.

Clinical Outcomes of Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Falls or Head Injury: Insights From RE-LY.

BACKGROUND: Falls are always a concern regarding the balance of risk/benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with anticoagulants. In this analysis, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients that had a fall/head injury reported in the RE-LY clinical trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) and to explore the safety of dabigatran (a nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant). METHODS: We performed a post hoc retrospective analysis of intracranial hemorrhage and major bleeding outcomes in the RE-LY trial with 18 113 individuals with atrial fibrillation, according to the status occurrence of falls (or head injury) reported as adverse events. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to provide adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. RESULTS: In the study, 974 falls or head injury events were reported among 716 patients (4%). These patients were older and had more frequently comorbidities such as diabetes, previous stroke, or coronary artery disease. Patients with fall had a higher risk of major bleeding (HR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.90-3.05]), intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.35-2.13]), and mortality (HR, 3.91 [95% CI, 2.51-6.10]) compared to those who did not have reported falls or head injury. Among patients who had falls, those allocated to dabigatran showed a lower intracranial hemorrhage risk (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.18-0.98]) compared with warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, the risk of falls is important and confers a worse prognosis, increasing intracranial hemorrhage, and major bleeding. Patients who fell and were under dabigatran was associated with lower intracranial hemorrhage risk than those anticoagulated with warfarin, but the analysis was merely exploratory.

Tranexamic Acid Improves Survival in the Setting of Severe Head Injury in Combat Casualties.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 1.7 million people sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBI) annually in the US. To reduce morbidity and mortality, management strategies aim to control progressive intracranial bleeding. This study analyzes the association between Tranexamic Acid (TXA) administration and mortality among casualties within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, specifically focusing on subsets of patients with varying degree of head injury severities. METHODS: Besides descriptive statistics, we used inverse probability weighted (for age, military service category, mechanism of injury, total units of blood units administered), and injury severity (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head score adjusted generalized linear models to analyze the association between TXA and mortality. Specific subgroups of interest were increasing severities of head injury and further stratifying these by Glasgow Coma Score of 3-8 and severe overall bodily injuries (ISS>=15). RESULTS: 25,866 patients were included in the analysis. 2,352 (9.1%) received TXA and 23,514 (90.9%) did not receive TXA. Among those with ISS>=15 (n=6,420), 21.2% received TXA. Among those with any head injury (AIS head injury severity score>=1; n=9,153), 7.2% received TXA. The median ISS scores were greater in the TXA versus no-TXA group (17 versus 6). Weighted and adjusted models showed overall, there was 25% lower mortality risk between those who received TXA at any point and those who did not (OR:0.75, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.95). Further, as the AIS severity score increased from >=1 (1.08; 0.80, 1.47) to >=5 (0.56; 0.33, 0.97), the odds of mortality decreased. CONCLUSIONS: TXA may potentially be beneficial in patients with severe head injuries, especially those with severe overall injury profiles. There is a need of definitive studies to confirm this association.

Chemical Kindling as an Experimental Model to Assess the Conventional Drugs in the Treatment of Post-traumatic Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality today, which will surpass many infectious diseases in the coming years/decades. Posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) is one of the most common debilitating consequences of TBI. PTE is a secondary, acquired epilepsy that causes recurrent, spontaneous seizures more than a week after TBI. The extent of head injury in individuals who develop PTE is unknown; however, trauma is thought to account for 20% of symptomatic epilepsy worldwide. Understanding the mechanisms of epilepsy following TBI is crucial for the discovery of new anticonvulsant drugs for the treatment of PTE, as well as for improving the quality of life of patients with PTE. OBJECTIVE: This review article explains the rationale for the usage of a chemical model to access new treatments for post-traumatic epilepsy. RESULTS: There are multiple methods to control and manage PTE. The essential and available remedy for the management of epilepsy is the use of antiepileptic drugs. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) decrease the frequency of seizures without affecting the disease's causality. Antiepileptic drugs are administrated for the prevention and treatment of PTE; however, 30% of epilepsy patients are drug-resistant, and AED side effects are significant in PTE patients. There are different types of animal models, such as the liquid percussion model, intracortical ferric chloride injection, and cortical subincision model, to study PTE and neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the development of epilepsy after head injury. However, these animal models do not easily mimic the pathological events occurring in epilepsy. Therefore, animal models of PTE are an inappropriate tool for screening new and putatively effective AEDs. Chemical kindling is the most common animal model used to study epilepsy. There is a strong similarity between the kindling model and different types of human epilepsy. CONCLUSION: Today, researchers use experimental animal models to evaluate new anticonvulsant drugs. The chemical kindling models, such as pentylenetetrazol, bicuculline, and picrotoxin-induced seizures, are important experimental models to analyze the impact of putative antiepileptic drugs.

Study of Compound Sanqi Nanoparticles for Local Infection of Hydrocephalus Patients after Neurosurgery Medium Craniocerebral Injury.

Panax notoginseng is the dried root and rhizome of Panax notoginseng, which has the effect of lowering blood lipid, lowering blood pressure and promoting blood circulation to remove blood stasis. At present, the research on Panax notoginseng is mainly focused on its pharmacological action and its compound preparation, but the research on the granule of Panax notoginseng is less. This paper mainly studied the clinical study of compound notoginseng nanoparticles in the treatment of local infection in patients with hydrocephalus after medium craniocerebral injury in neurosurgery. The purpose of this article is to investigate the effects of compound notoginseng nanoparticles on serum TNF-α, IL-2 and IL-6 in rats with craniocerebral injury and to verify the protective effect of compound notoginseng nanoparticles on the body after craniocerebral injury. In this paper, 90 patients admitted to a hospital in this city were divided into a control group, model group and compound notoginseng nanoparticle group. According to the Zealonga method, the neurological function deficit score of experimental rats in each group was evaluated. The levels of TNF-α, IL-2 and IL-6 in the serum of the three groups were observed 1, 3 and 5 days after treatment. RESULTS: Compared with serum TNF-α, IL-2 and IL-6 of the three groups, there were significant differences in the main effects of time and intervention (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compound notoginseng nanoparticles can reduce the contents of TNF-α and IL-6 in serum and increase the expression of IL-2 in rats with craniocerebral injury.

Effect of Ulinastatin Combined with Xingnaojing Injection on Severe Traumatic Craniocerebral Injury and Its Influence on Oxidative Stress Response and Inflammatory Response.

OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at exploring the effect of ulinastatin combined with Xingnaojing injection on severe traumatic craniocerebral injury and its influence on oxidative stress response and inflammatory response in patients. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with severe traumatic craniocerebral injury admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were selected and equally assigned into a study group (50 cases) and a control group (50 cases) according to a random sampling method. Patients in study group received treatment of ulinastatin combined with Xingnaojing injection, while those in control group were treated with ulinastatin only. The study compared the two groups on the oxidative stress response, inflammatory response, the therapeutic effect, and the incidence rate of adverse reactions. RESULTS: It is observed that patients in study group obtained lower levels of free cortisol (FC) and norepinephrine (NE) in the serum and higher level of total thyroxine (TT4) after treatment compared with those in control group with significant difference (P < 0.05); in the meantime, they were examined to have significantly fewer oxidative stress response products, lower serum inflammatory factor level, and serum indicator levels of craniocerebral injury as opposed to those in control group, suggesting significant differences (P < 0.05); study group demonstrated higher treatment response rate and lower incidence rate of adverse reactions compared with control group with a significant difference (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study found that ulinastatin combined with Xingnaojing infection has a significant effect in the treatment of severe traumatic craniocerebral injury, which can reduce the degree of craniocerebral injury and the level of inflammatory factors in the serum of patients. It is worthy of being promoted and applied clinically.

Evaluation of Neuroprotective Effects of Sugammadex Following a Head Trauma in an Experimental Study.

ABSTRACT: To compare the efficacy of mannitol, the first choice of treatment in daily clinical practice for head trauma, and sugammadex, a frequently used neuroanesthesia in recent years. A total of 35 male rats were randomly selected and were divided into 5 groups, each comprising 7 rats. The groups were divided into Group I, sham (n = 7); Group II, control (head trauma, n = 7); Group III, treated with mannitol (head trauma, mannitol 20% 1 g/kg, n = 7); Group IV, treated with sugammadex (head trauma, sugammadex 100 mg/ kg, n = 7); and Group V, treated with mannitol and sugammadex (head trauma, mannitol 20% 1 g/kg and sugammadex 100 mg/kg, n = 7). After the sacrification, histological examination and immu-nohistochemical staining were performed in the brain of all subjects. Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the significance between neuronal density, neuronal nuclei, and activated caspase-3 immunohistochemistry results measured from the prefrontal cortex. Neuronal density showing neuronal viability was observed to significantly increase in Group III compared to Group IV. However, neuronal nuclei immunohistochemistry showing apoptotic neurons also significantly increased. The present study has shown that sugammadex, an agent reversing the effects of neuromuscular blocking agents, has neuroprotective effects and is as effective as mannitol.

Survey evaluating clinical equipoise around platelet transfusion after head injury and traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) in patients on antiplatelet medications.

INTRODUCTION: Patients aged 60 or over account for over half of the severely injured trauma patients and a traumatic brain injury is the most common injury sustained. Many of these patients are taking antiplatelet medications but there is clinical equipoise about the role of platelet transfusion in patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) taking prior antiplatelet medications. METHOD: A prepiloted survey was designed to explore a range of clinical issues in managing patients taking antiplatelet medications admitted with a traumatic brain injury. This was sent via email to consultants and specialty registrar members of a variety of relevant UK societies and working groups in the fields of emergency medicine, critical care, neurosurgery and haematology. RESULTS: 193 responses were received, mostly from colleagues in emergency medicine, neurosurgery, anaesthesia and haematology. Respondents indicated that there is a lack of evidence to support the use of platelet transfusion in this patient population but also lack of evidence of harm. Results also demonstrate uncertainties as to whether platelets should be given to all or some patients and doubt regarding the value of viscoelastic testing. DISCUSSION: Our survey demonstrates equipoise in current practice with regards to platelet transfusion in patients with a traumatic ICH who are taking antiplatelet medication. There is support for additional trials to investigate the effect of platelet transfusion in this rising population of older, high-risk patients, in order to provide a better evidence-base for guideline development.

Trends in opioid prescription for craniomaxillofacial trauma in the United States: An 11-year retrospective study of emergency room and office visits.

BACKGROUND: Facial trauma is associated with significant long-term morbidity and pain. These patients are routinely prescribed opioid medication and are at risk for opioid dependence. Rates and trends in opioid prescription in the ambulatory setting for management of craniofacial trauma are unknown. METHODS: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data were analyzed from 2006 to 2016. Using International Classification of Diseases codes, 7,997,454 visits for craniomaxillofacial trauma were identified. Trends in opioid and nonopioid prescriptions were studied, with variables of interest including demographics, geographic region, expected source of payment, and injury location. RESULTS: Over the study period, trends in both opioid and nonopioid prescriptions remained stable, with about 13.4% of all visits receiving opioid prescriptions. Patients aged 18 to 44 (P < .001) and lower face trauma (P = .047) were associated with increased rates, while Medicare and charity payers (P < .001) were associated with lower rates of opioid prescriptions. There was no significant difference in prescription rates across geographical regions, by ethnicity, or sex. CONCLUSION: Opioid medication forms the cornerstone for ambulatory management of craniofacial trauma. Despite increased awareness and emphasis on multimodal pain management, opioid prescription trends have remained relatively stable over time.

Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: early recognition and stroke prevention in the emergency department.

Blunt cerebrovascular injuries include cervical carotid dissections and vertebral artery dissections that are due to blunt trauma. Although the overall incidence is low, dissections remain a common cause of stroke in children, young adults, and trauma patients. Symptoms of dissection, such as headache, neck pain, and dizziness, are commonly seen in the emergency department, but may not be apparent in the obtunded trauma patient or may not be recognized as being due to a dissection. A missed diagnosis of cervical artery dissection can result in devastating neurologic sequelae, and emergency clinicians must act quickly to recognize this diagnosis and begin treatment as soon as possible. This supplement reviews the application of advanced screening criteria, imaging options, and antithrombotic treatment for patients with blunt cerebrovascular injuries, with a focus on reducing the occurrence of ischemic stroke.

Progesterona para el tratamiento del trauma craneoencefálico grave: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis / Progesterone to treat severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis / Progesterona para o tratamento do traumatismo crânio-encefálico grave: revisão sistemática e meta-análise

Resumen: Objetivo: revisar sistemáticamente la evidencia sobre la administración de progesterona tras un trauma craneoencefálico grave en adultos y su relación con mortalidad y pronóstico neurológico. Criterios de inclusión: ensayos clínicos aleatorizados que incluyan a pacientes adultos mayores de 18 años, haber sufrido un traumatismo craneal grave (Glasgow <8), donde se compare la administración de progesterona vs grupo control (placebo o no administración). Método: se realizó la búsqueda en las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE, the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE; Cochrane Injuries group y lista de referencia de los artículos. Resultados: no hubo reducción de la mortalidad comparado con el grupo control (RR 0,93, IC95% 0,79-1,10 p= 0,41), no hubo diferencias entre progesterona y el grupo control en desenlaces neurológicos positivos ni negativos (RR 1,07, IC95% 0,97-1,17 p= 0,20; RR 0,94, IC 95% 0,81-1,08 p= 0,27), respectivamente. Conclusiones: no se encontró evidencia respecto a que la administración de progesterona posterior a un traumatismo craneoencefálico reduzca la mortalidad o mejore desenlaces neurológicos, aunque se necesitan más estudios de buena calidad para extraer conclusiones definitivas.

Summary: Objective: to systematically review evidence on the administration of progesterone after a traumatic brain injury in adults and its relationship with mortality and neurological head prognosis. Inclusion criteria: randomized clinical trials that include: patients older than 12 years old, having had an injury (Glasgow <8), comparing the administration of Progesterone versus the control group (placebo or no administration). Methods: we searched the following databases: MEDLINE, the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE; Cochrane Injury Group and reference list of articles. Results: there was no reduction in mortality in patients in the control group (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79-1.10 p = 0.41), there were no differences between progesterone and the control group in favorable or adverse neurological outcomes (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97-1.17 p = 0.20, RR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.81 -1,08 p= 0.27), respectively. Conclusions: there is no evidence that the administration of progesterone after a traumatic brain injury reduces or improves neurological results, although further good quality studies are required to obtain conclusive results.

Resumo: Objetivo: realizar uma revisão sistemática da evidência sobre a administração de progesterona depois de traumatismo crânio-encefálico grave em adultos e sua relação com a mortalidade e o prognóstico neurológico. Critérios de inclusão: ensaios clínicos aleatorizados que incluam: pacientes adultos maiores de 18 anos, haver sofrido um traumatismo craniano grave (Glasgow <8) donde se compare a administração de progesterona versus grupo controle (placebo ou não administração). Métodos: foi feita uma pesquisa bibliográfica nas seguintes bases de dados: MEDLINE, Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE, Cochrane Injuries Group e nas referências bibliográficas dos artigos. Resultados: não foi observada uma redução da mortalidade comparada com o grupo controle (RR 0,93, IC del 95%: 0,79-1,10 p= 0,41), não foram observadas diferenças entre o grupo que recebeu progesterona e o grupo controle nos resultados neurológicos positivos ou negativos (RR 1,07, IC del 95%: 0,97-1,17 p= 0,20; RR 0,94, IC del 95%: 0,81-1,08 p= 0,27), respectivamente. Conclusões: não se encontrou evidência de que a administração de progesterona depois de um traumatismo crânio-encefálico reduza a mortalidade ou melhore os resultados neurológicos embora novos estudos de boa qualidade sejam necessários para chegar a conclusões definitivas.

Prehospital Use of Ketamine in the Combat Setting: A Sub-Analysis of Patients With Head Injuries Evaluated in the Prospective Life Saving Intervention Study.

OBJECTIVES: Ketamine is used as an analgesic for combat injuries. Ketamine may worsen brain injury, but new studies suggest neuroprotection. Our objective was to report the outcomes of combat casualties with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who received prehospital ketamine. METHODS: This was a post hoc, sub-analysis of a larger prospective, multicenter study (the Life Saving Intervention study [LSI]) evaluating prehospital interventions performed in Afghanistan. A DoD Trauma Registry query provided disposition at discharge and outcomes to be linked with the LSI data. RESULTS: For this study, we enrolled casualties that were suspected to have TBI (n = 160). Most were 26-year-old males (98%) with explosion-related injuries (66%), a median injury severity score of 12, and 5% mortality. Fifty-seven percent (n = 91) received an analgesic, 29% (n = 46) ketamine, 28% (n = 45) other analgesic (OA), and 43% (n = 69) no analgesic (NA). The ketamine group had more pelvic injuries (P = 0.0302) and tourniquets (P = 0.0041) compared to OA. In comparison to NA, the ketamine group was more severely injured and more likely to require LSI procedures, yet, had similar vital signs at admission and disposition at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: We found that combat casualties with suspected TBI that received prehospital ketamine had similar outcomes to those that received OAs or NAs despite injury differences.